Ron Ritzman wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:50 PM, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
That's actually a really good idea.
To expand upon the idea. AFD rules would remain the same for BLPs and non BLPs (notable or not notable) with "no consensus" defaulting to "keep". However, if the subject requests deletion or otherwise starts to make trouble for the project, then his article would go to "BLPs for discussion" Where the article would be deleted (or stubified and protected) unless there is a clean consensus to keep.
I can't express my opposition to this strongly enough. We should under no circumstances *encourage* people to try to damage the encyclopedia by giving them a special process by which to do so.
-Mark