On 3/3/06, Matt Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
References SHOULD NEVER BE REMOVED unless alternative
references for
the referenced facts are found or the information those references
support is removed from the article. To do otherwise is completely
against the spirit of our verifiability and sourcing policies and
practise.
...or the references are genuinely bogus. Not as in, "exists but is no
good", but is in, "made it up to support my cause". (yes I've seen
this)
Steve