On 1/31/06, SCZenz <sczenz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think this loophole is a clear argument for WP:DRV
to make decisions
based only on process, not on content. If it's not consensus-based,
we can't have the decision to delete be made there.
Yes, perhaps the solution is for appeals on process to go to DRV, and
appeals on content to be moved to AfD if the process appeal fails.
The intervening time could be used as a reprieve period during which
those who believe the content to be of potential value could work on
it.