On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 19:46:26 -0700, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Let's face it, just mentioning NOR and fancruft in
starting a thread
where you sought responses on a copyright question was bound to give the
wrong impression. You've been around long enough to be aware of the
uncanny ability of members of this list for finding the wrong emphasis
in a message. :-)
Well yes, that's true. What I hadn't realised was that there appears
to be a degree of philosophical opposition to the idea of copyright,
or at least to the idea that we should only include what we know to be
clean, rather than waiting for conclusive proof before removing
anything. That's a reversal of the burden of proof, as far as I'm
concerned.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG