On 11/27/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
This is nothing less than an attempt to subvert the Arbcom process. From the beginning the Arbcom was set up as a body to hear appeals of admin actions such as blocking. Running things by the Arbcom *before* taking administrative action means that any appeals will be against a stacked deck.
This is the most intelligent comment made by anyone thusfar in this thread.
—C.W.