Here's the thing: the GNAA aren't exclusively a trolling phenomenon on
slashdot, so redirecting to ./ trolling phenomenon would be misleading.
TBSDY
Robin Shannon wrote:
When i first heard about GNAA on some slashdot post
(or mailing list
or something, i cant remember...), i didnt have a clue what it was
talking about, so the first thing i did was go to [[GNAA]]. Equaly as
this thread has progresed SOLLOG was mentioned and i went to
[[SOLLOG]], and both times i found exactly what i wanted to know to
put the origanal posts in context. I would much prefer blanking of the
article and a redirect to slashdot trolling (or whatever). It is
important the next person who comes along can type in [[GNAA]] and
find the info they want. For me wikipedia is the new google. When i
dont understand a term, i wikipedia it, and i think that this is
something that should be kept in mind on VfD.
paz y amor,
[[User:The bellman]]
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 12:26:47 +1100, csherlock(a)ljh.com.au
<csherlock(a)ljh.com.au> wrote:
Guys, how many times are we going to list this
before we stop this abuse
of process? This is now the fifth time the article has been on votes for
deletion and that sucks.