Here's the thing: the GNAA aren't exclusively a trolling phenomenon on slashdot, so redirecting to ./ trolling phenomenon would be misleading.
TBSDY
Robin Shannon wrote:
When i first heard about GNAA on some slashdot post (or mailing list or something, i cant remember...), i didnt have a clue what it was talking about, so the first thing i did was go to [[GNAA]]. Equaly as this thread has progresed SOLLOG was mentioned and i went to [[SOLLOG]], and both times i found exactly what i wanted to know to put the origanal posts in context. I would much prefer blanking of the article and a redirect to slashdot trolling (or whatever). It is important the next person who comes along can type in [[GNAA]] and find the info they want. For me wikipedia is the new google. When i dont understand a term, i wikipedia it, and i think that this is something that should be kept in mind on VfD.
paz y amor, [[User:The bellman]]
On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 12:26:47 +1100, csherlock@ljh.com.au csherlock@ljh.com.au wrote:
Guys, how many times are we going to list this before we stop this abuse of process? This is now the fifth time the article has been on votes for deletion and that sucks.