(resubmission, submitted before under improper email profile)
Just a little note.
In the interest of fairness I wanted to state that it may not be strictly
true that no one objects to the ban on User:Viking. I believe User:Triton
may. The following is from Triton on my Talk page (now archived at User
Talk:Dante Alighieri/clovis et al.):
Take a look now at the new way of humiliating a user. A new file has
been made called
User
talk:Viking/ban that will keep showing up on the Recent Changes list
as many times as their attacker(s) wish. When someone not involved sees
that, what is the impression of UserViking?
Now, I don't know for CERTAIN that this means Triton objects to the
ban, but I certainly would want to give Triton the chance to clarify
himself. I wouldn't want his comments to go unheard and risk us banning
Viking without giving anyone who cares to defend him a chance to do
so.
Let's not ban Viking until we give Triton a clear chance to voice
himself. I would hate for Triton to go unheard.
-----
Dante Alighieri
dalighieri@digitalgrapefruit.com
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain
their neutrality in times of great moral crisis."
-Dante Alighieri, 1265-1321