On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:09 PM, David Levy lifeisunfair@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, there is. Your methodology has been challenged
I don't recall any challenges, just people expressing their contempt for external links, which is not a methodological challenge.
Or did you mean the issue about editing logged in versus logged out as an anon? Obviously I did all my editing as an anon: if even an anonymous IP can get away this kind of blatant vandalism just by invoking the name WP:EL, then that's a lower bound on how much an editor can get away with.
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
Removing 100 random external links? For a few weeks? Then adding back the ones that deserve to be added back?
I think it's less questionable to just re-add all the links, no questions asked about 'deserving'.