On 7/13/07, Garion96 <garion96(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 7/14/07, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Also, is "Images for deletion" working well? Could fair-use disputes
(by bots) be taken to Ifd? I think it would be helpful if fair-use
discussions were held in a centralised place per image, rather than on
some talk page as appears to be the case currently.
--
John
There is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fair_use_review
This is my personal opinion, and probably not even consensus within
admins who deal with images a lot. IFD and fair use review are
somewhat old systems that stay in place because of inertia more than
anything else. They don't scale at all to the number of images that
get deleted for various reasons every day. Obviously we will always
need some completely deliberative process for images that fail every
other mode, and IFD probably should remain to fill that need. The more
we can move the rest of the processes to a decentralized model the
better though.
Judson
[[:en:User:Cohesion]]