I agree...
--- Benjamin Hallert <ben(a)vipmail.com> wrote:
consideration to the idea of avoiding hardblocks for
username violations
because of the heaviness of the action.
I've started a discussion on WP:U and on
Template:UsernameHardBlocked about
aspects of this issue and would like to solicit
additional input from the
community.
Nowhere else on Wikipedia do we essentially within our
powers ban someone
for life on the result of a single misstep, and I don't
believe we should do
it here too.
Regards,
Chairboy
... completely. I'd participate in the discussion, but I'm
blocked. Feel free to copy/paste. Wikipedia is without
question the worst wiki when it comes to utterly useless
blocking. Like dealing with some church librarian stuck in
a basement erasing naughty words from books. If it's
supposed to be uncensored, quit wasting everybody's fucking
time, including your own. Clear enough?
~~Pro-Lick
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick
http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________
Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for
today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.
http://get.games.yahoo.com/proddesc?gamekey=monopolyherenow