Alphax wrote:
Haukur Þorgeirsson wrote:
Look at this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:LindisfarneFol27rIncipitMatt.jpg
You'll see that there's a link to the British Library
page from which the image was snatched. Following that
link you'll see that the British Library claims copyright
on the image. As far as I know this may well hold up
under British law (evil as that would be).
The photograph is of a book over 1000 years old, so the art itself is in
the public domain. The photograph on the library website is of the book,
framed by a ruler and colour scale. And then, a nice little " Copyright
© The British Library" down the bottom. Now AFAICT (and IANAL), there is
nothing creative about that photograph. I find their claim of copyright
spurious, to say the least.
First off, I should point out that I, too, am not a lawyer. :-)
A great many^W^Wall museums in the United Kingdom seen to operate (and
instruct their lawyers to do so, too) under the belief that the
copyright laws are suspended, and perpetual copyright reigns forth in
its place, on images of any and all objects owned by the institution. It
seems to work like this:
* You can see what we show for free.
(This has nothing to do with copyright law, just Arts Council rules.)
* But you can't take pictures, because we say so.
(This is a by-law thing, and has nothing to do with copyright law.)
* When the museum has photographs taken, this is quite a business.
(This is logistics, and has nothing to do with copyright law.)
* The photographs are made using the museum's money, staff, and time.
(This is irrelevant to copyright law; what counts is.)
Thus, the only way of getting a photograph of an object owned by a
museum is through 'piggy-backing' on the money and time that the museum
has spent; they feel that, because of this, they should be entitled to
money for each viewing, or whatever.
To the best of my knowledge, this desire for recompense does not seem to
be borne out in law[*]. I would be grateful for a correction by anyone
more knowledgeable than me, especially one from a museum which practices
this principle.
[*] - The relevant law is the Copyright, Designs And Patents Act 1988,
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/Ukpga_19880048_en_1.htm
Yours sincerely,
--
James D. Forrester
Wikimedia : [[W:en:User:Jdforrester|James F.]]
E-Mail : james(a)jdforrester.org
IM (MSN) : jamesdforrester(a)hotmail.com