On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 01:46:12 -0700, "Matthew Brown" <morven(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
With the exception of fair use, of course - which is in
fact more
useful AND more defensible in text than in pictures. (For UK
contributors, of course, replace that with 'fair dealing' which is
much more restrictive, but I believe DOES still allow for criticism
and commentary - though someone better versed in it would be useful)
Indeed. So some examples would be fine, and a discussion of the
process would be fine. I am completely behind both. What is not
fine, in any case I can think of, is reproducing the content *in its
entirety* as part of that.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG