On 5/30/07, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I understand. Let me phrase it this way: RFA. Bob runs
for adminship. Bob
has good edits, good this, good that. He'd likely be a fine canidate and a
fine admin. John alleges, on Bob's RFA, that Bob is a regular contributor to
an attack site. Someone asks for proof of this. Here are three questions for
both you and Slim, and others:
1. How can John offer proof? We can't link to attack sites. Is John supposed
to name the site, and tell people what to search for?
Name the site, and give the date and time of the posts; or upload
screenshots; or better still ask John to confirm or deny that he's a
regular poster. If he confirms, no need to link. If he denies, no
point in linking.