Any given use
of administrative powers cannot be reverted or
reversed by another admin unless the issue is brought to adequate
discussion.
This disturbs me a bit. I can think of many legitimate examples
where an admin might reverse another admin's action without
discussion. I did it just a couple of days ago, for instance, where
I undeleted an article that had been incorrectly tagged for
speedying and then deleted. I didn't discuss this with the deleting
admin (I didn't think it needed discussing, frankly; I did leave a
courtesy note explaining what I'd done on his talk page). Was this
'wheel warring'? Under your policy it would get me desysopped.
I agree and have changed this part of the proposal already.
--
Philip L. Welch