Charles Matthews wrote:
Hah! You are trying to win an argument by appealing to the authority of Wikipedia, with something inserted a few days ago which doesn't look very reliable to me (author can't do "its" and "it's", bad sign, as well as this being point six out of five). I hope at least it wasn't inserted by you.
a) I'm not trying to "win" an argument, I'm trying to further my understanding of this policy. Frankly I'd be very happy to "lose" and be shown NPOV actually says what people seem to think it says.
b) I noted the irony of it already
c) Accusations of sock puppetry are pretty serious, and you have absolutely no reason to believe whoever added that info is me. Since you've obviously already checked the edit history (where my name is not present), I can only take this as such an accusation. I request you withdraw your accusation and [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith]] in the future.
Shane.