On 2/14/06, Matt Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Part of the reason I started contributing to Wikipedia
was the (then)
tolerance for good-faith works in progress.
I still believe the rate of addition of new articles is not so great
that we cannot stop and check a few things before nominating for
deletion. I feel a good proportion of the problem is that patrolling
new pages attracts the immediateist and impatient above the
eventualist and patient contributor.
Hang on, are we now actually having a discussion about deleting
well-written stubs on good topics? No one's really proposing that are
they?
Steve