Anthony DiPierro wrote:
IOW, no, the desires of the copyright holder have
no bearing on
whether an image can be fairly used, because the fair use defense
presumes that the copyright holder objects to the use.
I'm not a lawyer, but this seems like pretty simple logic to me...
I thought so too, and another editor who _is_ a lawyer (User:Bobak)
looked at the situation in a fair bit of detail and agreed with my
logic. But UninvitedCompany claimed at the end of the deletion review
that the Wikimedia Foundation lawyer had had a look at the situation and
said it should be deleted. Unfortunately I wasn't able to find either a
link to the Foundation lawyer's comments or the original copyright
holder's complaint anywhere, so it still leaves me completely in the
dark as to why this logic is apparently wrong in this case.
It was a WP:OFFICE action. No further explanation is required.
Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
"We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales