On 2/12/06, charles matthews <charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Just for everyone else, then. There is no 'moral equivalence' about it.
This has been about content and form, and those puzzled presumably thought
that sticking to 'form', and disregarding what was really happening, was
I'm surprised that this has to be pointed out, really. I shouldn't
be. We're becoming so process-bound and wrapped up in groupthink that
applying commonsense to a situation is not only seen as unusual, on
occasion it is seen as *destructive*.