On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Flameviper Velifang
<theflameysnake(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
In regards to the "wikiunderground" site, I
have a couple questions.
Is it directly tied-in to the Wikimedia software? Or is it just a fast-refreshing
crawler? If the latter, is it sufficiently equipped to handle all article deletions?
Secondly, this concept raises a lot of possibilities. First of all, the question of
deletion itself. Is there a need to permanently delete pages so that only administrators
can view them? Or could we have another userlevel (somewhere between autoconfirmed and
admin) called "Pageview" where you could view deleted pages? I mean, this might
be a bad idea because it would remove the importance of deletion (why bother deleting a
page if some users will be able to view it) but this level might require 6 months and 500
edits.
Thirdly, a developer might even want to automate this process, wherein all deleted pages
are transfered to a subdomain, perhaps
deleted.wikipedia.org or something to that effect.
Just some thoughts.
Just a thought.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Anyone can see a deletion log, and several admins (including myself)
will email or restore a temporary copy to userspace of an article
that's not potential libel or copyvio upon a good faith request. If
someone comes to me and says "Hey, the article on Character X from
Series Y was deleted, I would like a temporary copy of the article and
its history to copy to a fan wiki", and said article was not
potentially libelous or a copyvio, I'm happy to do so. I guess I don't
see the need for this. I think administrative oversight isn't a bad
thing when deciding if a deleted article should be available for such
purposes.
--
Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.