I agree, and think that pages should be protected far
more easily than a user should be blocked. The
current rigid, tie-our-hands protection policy seems
to force people to think in terms of arbitration and
blocking, rather than protecting. This in turn makes
the arbitration commitees job harder, I think, wheras
the proactive settle it on the page approach seems
more wikifaithful.

S

--- Charles Matthews
wrote:

> Try sending an email, before taking an extreme step?
> (Blocking for a story
> simply about title changes and redirects _is_ an
> extreme step; you allege
> POV editing also. This may be annoying, but
> blocking?)
>
> Charles
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l