On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Fred Bauder
<fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net>
wrote:
Here is
another prime example of how the user is misled when using the
english wikipedia.
lets say you are looking for Maja Pançiq, you wont find the article,
because someone commented out the name in the article
Pan%C4%8Di%C4%87%27s_Peak. Just because albanian is not an official
language in central serbia, they say. First of all, there are many
albanians living in that area, and second of all, the point is listed
as a border point between Kosovo and Serbia in the GNS database. We
cannot have a dysfunctional wikipedia, we need to contain both names
and make it possible to navigate.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan%C4%8Di%C4%87%27s_Peak
thanks,
mike
You are, of course, correct, assuming the mountain has a commonly used
name in the Albanian language, whether it is on the border or not.
The name is common, it is listed even in the albanian wikipedia,
http://sq.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maja_Pan%C3%A7iq
It is on wikimapia
http://wikimapia.org/7522941/sq/Maja-Pan%C3%A7iq
listed in wikibooks
http://sq.wikibooks.org/wiki/Tokajon/Fjalorthi
It has 32 results on google, and at least it should be mentioned.
The point is that we are forced to monitor all changes all the time
because some editors have a bad habit of POV deleting data, it is
reoccurring and very annoying.
thanks,
mike
Each of these editors needs to be brought into the dialog. We should
assume that once they are aware of the issue that they will cooperate in
solving the problem.
Fred Bauder