On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: The Mangoe [mailto:the.mangoe@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 2, 2007 08:03 AM To: 'English Wikipedia' Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] FredBauder"clarifies"onattack site link policy
On 7/2/07, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
I did originate it though and am not intimidated. I shudder to
contemplate what
Mr. Goodman wants for Wikipedia. If a pack of dogs fall on someone
after he and
his ilk are in control, I guess we will simply be obligated to stand by
and do
nothing.
The central problem in all of this is the hyperbole. At worst the WR-ites are a bunch of malcontents whose not always coherent ravings can be ignored by choosing not to visit their site. As a "pack of dogs", they rank right up there in threat with a litter of Pekinese pups.
I recall no arbitration ruling which relates to Wikipedia Review.
Fred
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Why did you endorse my block if this is the case? The block was enacted solely on the ruling in the MONGO case and was applied to my reverting to a version of a page that contained a reference to Wikipedia Review. If there was no arbitration ruling that relates to Wikipedia Review, how is the justification for my block valid? Why did you support it?