We have talked informally to some lawyers, some of them specialists in the
relevant fields. Basically the understanding I was previously describing
was confirmed, but more importantly there has been only a small number of
cases testing out the implementation of the European database directive
(and the ECJs cases were curtailing the scope of the sui generis
protection, see British Horseracing Board v William Hill, Fixtures v Oy
Vekkaus, and others).
The US situation is much simpler, as there are no such database rights, and
also the Feist v Rural case, which constraints rights on such data widely.
But besides that, yes, we also have formally requested an assessment on the
discussed topics (and a bit beyond) from lawyers, but this will take a
while until we have the results. Once we have them we will share them.
Cheers,
Denny
2012/12/12 Sven <svenmanguard(a)gmail.com>
The WMF has lawyers. Why not ask Geoff for an official
statement?
Sven
On Dec 12, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Harry Burt <jarry1250(a)gmail.com> wrote:
(sorry, don't have the proper subject line to hand)
Are proper lawyers being consulted about this (database rights)? The
quantity of unofficial speculation on this list is in good faith but still
somewhat concerning...
Harry
--
Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250)
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 |
http://wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.