Stas and All,
Would the coordinate precision in Wikidata and Query Service allow us now
to move to the cellular and even the atomic and subatomic levels, say, for
example, when querying for differences between microscopic species in a
piece of earth in a municipality that might be rich in smallest life forms
- say differences between nanobes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanobe
And would Wikidata want even further precision for knowledge generation
based on what we might learn from expansion microcopy e.g. Ed Boyden's work
at MIT - say in brain science - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPlr31LrT0g
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev(a)wikimedia.org>
I would like to initiate a discussion about coordinate precision in
Wikidata and Query Service. The reason is that right now we do not have
any limit to precision, coordinates are basically doubles, and that
allows to specify over-precise coordinates and makes it harder to
compare them - both between themselves within Wikidata and with outside
From the precision description in , we would rarely need beyond third
or fourth digit after the decimal point. However, we have in the
database coordinates like: Point(13.366666666 41.766666666) which
pretends to specify it with sub-millimeter accuracy - for an entity that
describes a municipality!
We do have precision on values - e.g. the above has specified precision
of "arcseconds" - so it may be just a formatting issue, but even
arcsecond looks somewhat over-precise for a city. And it may be a bit
challenging to convert DMS precision DD precision.
But the bigger question is whether we should store over-precise
coordinates in the database at all, or we should round them up on export
or inside the data. The formulae that are used to calculate distances
have, by obvious reasons, limited precision, and direct comparisons
can't take precision into account, which may lead to such coordinates
very hard to work with. Should we maybe just put a limit on how precise
we put coordinates into RDF and in query service? Would four decimals
after the dot be enough? According to  this is what commercial GPS
device can provide. If not, why and which accuracy would be appropriate?
We do export precision of the coordinate as wikibase:geoPrecision -
and we currently have 258060 distinct values for it. This is very weird.
I am not sure precision is useful in this form. Can anybody tell me any
use case for this number now? If not, maybe we should change how we
represent it. I'm also not sure where these come from as we only have
13 options in the UI. Bots?
Wikidata mailing list
- Scott MacLeod - Founder & President
- World University and School
- 415 480 4577
- CC World University and School - like CC Wikipedia with best STEM-centric
CC OpenCourseWare - incorporated as a nonprofit university and school in
California, and is a U.S. 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt educational organization.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments are intended only
for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed and may
contain information that is privileged, confidential, or exempt from
disclosure under applicable federal or state laws. If the reader of this
transmission is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
please notify me immediately by email or telephone.
World University and School is sending you this because of your interest in
free, online, higher education. If you don't want to receive these, please
reply with 'unsubscribe' in the body of the email, leaving the subject line
intact. Thank you.