Why? I would enthusiastically welcome an automated system that allows us to stay up to
date with all the authority databases for which we have properties.
At this moment, I have a hunch that we are already hopelessly out of date with most of the
ones we started to add a few years ago.
I’d like to hear other suggestions that provide broad scalable solutions for this (not
just ‘I’m tracking this one dataset that is important to me’, but ‘this allows us to track
all hundreds of external datasets we have some kind of identifiers for’).
Sandra
On 11 Jun 2016, at 09:32, Gerard Meijssen
<gerard.meijssen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hoi,
Resourcesync is unlikely to be adopted by Wikidata for adopting changes from elsewhere.
If others want to share data FROM WIkidata there is no problem with providing
Resourcesync.
What I do not completely understand is how its mechanism for indicating changes may be
used. When it can be used to generate reports so that people can actually see the
differences it could be really important to improve the quality.
The notion that we can just copy in data or change data based on an
"authorised" source is problematic.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 10 June 2016 at 21:12, Sandra Fauconnier <sandra.fauconnier(a)gmail.com
<mailto:sandra.fauconnier@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have recently read an interview with Herbert Van de Sompel
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Van_de_Sompel>, who among others has worked
on the OAI-PMH and the Memento project (for those for whom that rings a bell).
Recently his team has developed an initiative called ResourceSync
<http://www.openarchives.org/rs/toc>, that seems to be addressing exactly this -
keeping distributed databases on the web mutually up to date.
It’s the closest thing I’ve ever seen that seems to address what we (and the entire
interlinked web) would need in this area. I might have missed other initiatives, but this
one gave me a big AHA moment!
Here’s a short video that explains the principle:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASQ4jMYytsA
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASQ4jMYytsA>
In the interview I read. Herbert said that it didn’t see wide adoption yet though. I can
imagine that, if the Wikimedia projects’ software would adopt this, it might have a
snowball effect.
Best, Sandra
On 10 Jun 2016, at 20:43, Benjamin Good
<ben.mcgee.good(a)gmail.com <mailto:ben.mcgee.good@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Julie,
We've thought a lot about this, but not done anything formally yet. There is an
example of this happening to improve the disease ontology presented in this paper [1].
Mechanically, parties interested in a particular swath of data linked to their resource
could set up repeated SPARQL queries to watch for changes. Beyond that, the core
mediawiki API could be used to create alerts when new discussions are started on articles
or items of interest.
At some point we hope to produce a reporting site that would aggregate this kind of
information in our domain (feedback and changes by the community) as well as changes by
our bots and provide reports back to the primary sources and to whoever else was
interested. (Maybe we will see a start on that this summer..) This hasn't become a
priority yet because we haven't yet generated the community scope to make it a really
valuable source of input to the original databases.
[1]
http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/11/16/031971.full.pdf
<http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/11/16/031971.full.pdf>
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Julie McMurry <mcmurry.julie(a)gmail.com
<mailto:mcmurry.julie@gmail.com>> wrote:
It is great that WikiData provides a way for data to be curated in a crowd-sourced way.
It would be even better if changes (especially corrections) could be communicated back to
the original source so that all could benefit.
Has this been discussed previously? Considered?
Julie
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata