All you will have to put in the articles is {{GNF_proteinBox}}. Then when it renders the
page first it will write out the template. Then any {{#property:...}} calls that are
inserted will be replaced with the data from Wikidata. You never have to specify the
Wikidata ID manually. The #property finds the ID automatically based on the title of the
article that transcludes the template.
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 12:58:03 +0530
From: chin.naik26(a)gmail.com
To: wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Regarding wikidata inclusion syntax
Thanks michael. Its clear to me now. I had one more issue. We still have to use property
syntax in main wiki article. consider the following ex:
1) {{GNF_proteinBox|id=q1111}} (include in article ie link to item q111- gene wikidata
item)
In the main template structure we introduce parser functions{{#property: of wikidata
item....}}
2) {{GNF_proteinBox| specify property syntax here}}
case 2 is supported. what about case 1??
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Michael Hale <hale.michael.jr(a)live.com> wrote:
Yes, it seems to be working. I did a preview of deleting the flag parameter on the Italian
article for Turin and it still showed up. The template uses an {{#if:...}} like this:
{{#if:{{Wikidata|P41|{{{Bandiera|}}}}}|[[File:{{Wikidata|P41|{{{Bandiera|}}}}}|125x125px|border|{{#if:{{{Nome|}}}|{{{Nome}}}|{{PAGENAME}}
}} – Bandiera]]}}
From: hale.michael.jr(a)live.com
To: wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 02:02:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Regarding wikidata inclusion syntax
My understanding is that scenario will definitely be supported. I have no idea if it is
already or if the parser functions only currently work in articles.
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:17:43 +0530
From: chin.naik26(a)gmail.com
To: wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Regarding wikidata inclusion syntax
Hi ,
Thanks Michael for the info. Yes, the properties in the templates have to be yet created.
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Molecular_Biology_task_force/Properti…. We already
have a bot in python to query wikipedia.
I wanted to know whether the parser functions{{property:...}} are being evaluated after a
template is transcluded.
Hope to see that this feature would be implemented soon.
Ideally, we just want {{GNF_proteinBox}} at the beginning of the wiki article. If the
parser functions would not be supported, then what would be the best approach? Other than
passing arguments to {{GNF_ProteinBox}} in the wiki gene article. This would increase the
length of each wiki gene article.
Thanks in advance,
Chinmay
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Michael Hale <hale.michael.jr(a)live.com> wrote:
If you are saying that the parser functions ({{#property:...}}) aren't being evaluated
after the template is transcluded then I guess the feature isn't fully implemented
yet.
From: hale.michael.jr(a)live.com
To: wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 15:11:35 -0400
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] Regarding wikidata inclusion syntax
Hey, that's a great project. The current situation with ProteinBoxBot is not ideal. We
don't want to create a separate template for every protein. I suppose they do that now
to make the articles slightly shorter, but Wikidata will allow us to accomplish the same
thing without the confusing extra templates and ultimately to synchronize the infobox data
across different language Wikipedias. With Wikidata the idea is that you will eventually
just be able to write {{GNF Protein box}} at the top of the protein article and you will
get what you want. If you look at our current list of biology properties though, there are
still some that need to be added to fully support protein box.
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:List_of_properties#Biology_.2F_Biolog…
You can start adding data for the current properties already though. I just added the
Entrez ID to adenosine deaminase.
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q356093
A list of human proteins on Wikipedia is here.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Human_proteins You can access the list through code
by using a MediaWiki API request like this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=categorymembers&…
The use cmcontinue to get them in pages of 500 at a time until you have all 10000.
To go from article title to Wikidata item use something like
this:http://wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentities&sites=enwiki&am…
Then you'll want to propose a bot to automatically add properties.
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_permissions/Bot
The property inclusion syntax refers to the item on the article that transcludes the
template. So all of the extra templates that ProteinBoxBot is currently making would all
have identical wiki markup if it was fully using Wikidata.
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 19:46:25 +0530
From: chin.naik26(a)gmail.com
To: wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikidata-l] Regarding wikidata inclusion syntax
Hi,
I am Chinmay Naik, an undergrad in CS at Bangalore,India. I hope to contribute to
CrowsourcingBiology through GSOC 2013. The project i am interested is "convert bot to
write to wikidata". Currently the bot does this database ---> wikipedia. The
proposal is this database ----> wikidata -----> wikipedia.
I have the basic idea of how to capture gene info onto wikidata. I was wondering about the
inclusion syntax of wikidata. I had a look at the current inclusion of wikidata v0.3 meta.
Some things are unclear to me. How best it is to map wikidata items on to wiki
articles.??
Currently, the bot uses templates. The template structure is
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:GNF_Protein_box. The bot fills a various gene
templates
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:PBB/100. These gene templates are included
on gene wikipedia articles.
I tried to work out on the italian wikipedia. When i try to include a template(mapped to
wikidata item) onto an wiki article, the wikidata properties were not displayed.
So is it not possible to include wikidata items in template namespace??
So transclusion where data is retreived from wikidata item not supported??
Kindly pardon me if this is not the right mailing list to post to about this.
Thanks in advance,
Chinmay
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l