On 19/06/13 15:03, Tom Morris wrote: If you haven't already, it might be worth looking at the Freebase schema for Wordnet, especially how it connects synsets to Freebase topics: https://www.freebase.com/base/wordnet/synset?schema= Tom WordNet does not seem to be under a free license -- see http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/license/ Since Wikidata's CC0 licensing allows commercial use, surely integrating any kind of data from WordNet risks conflict with WordNet's license? Neil On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Denny Vrandečić &lt;denny.vrandecic(a)wikimedia.de&gt; wrote: Hello, I would like all interested in the interaction of Wikidata and Wiktionary to take a look at the following proposal. It is trying to serve all use cases mentioned so far, and remain still fairly simple to implement. <http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wiktionary> <http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wiktionary> To the best of our knowledge, we have checked all discussions on this topic, and also related work like OmegaWiki, Wordnet, etc., and are building on top of that. I would extremely appreciate if some liaison editors could reach out to the Wiktionaries in order to get a wider discussion base. We are currently reading more on related work and trying to improve the proposal. It would be great if we could keep the discussion on the discussion page on the wiki, so to bundle it a bit. Or at least have pointers there. <http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Wiktionary> <http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata_talk:Wiktionary> Note that we are giving this proposal early. Implementation has not started yet (obviously, otherwise the discussion would be a bit moot), and this is more a mid-term commitment (i.e. if the discussion goes smoothly, it might be implemented and deployed by the end of the year or so, although this depends on the results of the discussion obviously). Cheers, Denny -- Project director Wikidata Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985. _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing listWikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing listWikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.orghttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

If you haven't already, it might be worth looking at the Freebase schema for Wordnet, especially how it connects synsets to Freebase topics: https://www.freebase.com/base/wordnet/synset?schema= Tom On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Denny Vrandečić < denny.vrandecic(a)wikimedia.de&gt; wrote: _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

The current proposal does not cover grammar rules explicitly. If at all, I would regard that as a later extension once the lexical information is in place. Also, my limited understanding of the topic does not even allow for coming up with a data model to cover grammar rules, or to know whether there is something like sufficiently widely accepted models to represent grammar, or if there are still discussions whether Chomsky or Systemic Functional Grammars or whatever else would make the cut... Regarding "word" vs "expression" - I do not care much about the actual term, and it seems that both seem valid. With the suggested change from "meaning" to "word sense" though, it might make more sense to keep "word" here. But as said, no strong opinion here. I definitively see that saying that <http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/carry_coals_to_Newcastle> is a "word" is kinda weird. "expression" would fix that. Any further opinions? Cheers, Denny 2013/6/19 David Cuenca &lt;dacuetu(a)gmail.com&gt; -- Project director Wikidata Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.

Thanks, GerarM

Hoi, Denny, when you look at the data currently in Wikidata, you find what is in essence more than a basis for a translation dictionary.