### a few comments

* the properties are highlighted, not the more important values
* the items in the Identifier and Wikipedia link boxes should be aligned
* the contrast is very low in the "Berlin, Germany" line


### questions

Is there a good reason for:
* the blue boxes?
* the gradient in the boxes on the right?

* How do you count the number of discussion topics?
* Why not integrating this number in the discussion tab on the top.
* Are there so many discussions on wikidata items, that a so prominent
discussion box is appropriate?



### general notes

Maybe you should consider the the theory of data-ink-ratio: "A large
share of ink on a graphic should present data-information, the ink
changing as the data change. Data-ink is the non-erasable core of a
graphic, the non-redundant ink arranged in response to variation in the
numbers represented."
http://www.infovis-wiki.net/index.php/Data-Ink_Ratio


Here are two blog posts you should read:
http://darkhorseanalytics.com/blog/clear-off-the-table/
http://darkhorseanalytics.com/blog/data-looks-better-naked/


Lukas

Am Di 24.06.2014 17:46, schrieb Lydia Pintscher:

> Hey folks :)
>
> I just uploaded a new mockup for Wikidata's user interface design.
> Thanks so much for your feedback so far!
>
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:UI_redesign_input is the place to be ;-)
>
>
> Cheers
> Lydia
>

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l