You can have a look here.it is a quad file that contains DBpedia facts and I replaced the context with the citation when the citation is on the exact same line with the extracted fact. e.g.<http://dbpedia.org/resource/An_American_in_Paris > <http://dbpedia.org/property/work > "An American in Paris"@en <https://www.bnote.de/?set=werk_detail&kompid=246&bnnr= > .16963&lc=en It is based on a complete English dump from ~April and contains roughly 1M cited factsThis is more like a proof-of-concept and there are many ways to improve and make it more usable for Wikidatalet me know what you think--On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Brill Lyle <wp.brilllyle@gmail.com> wrote:Yes? I think so. Except I would like to see fuller citations extracted / sampled from / to? I don't have the technical skill to understand the extraction completely but Yes. I think there is very rich data in Wikipedia that is very extractable.Could this approach be a good candidate reference suggestions in Wikidata?(This particular one is already a reference but the anthem and GDP in the attachment are not for example)- ErikaErika HerzogWikipedia User:BrillLyleOn Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de > wrote:______________________________Hi,I had this idea for some time now but never got to test/write it down.DBpedia extracts detailed context information in Quads (where possible) on where each triple came from, including the line number in the wiki text.Although each DBpedia extractor is independent, using this context there is a small window for combining output from different extractors, such as the infobox statements we extract from Wikipedia and the very recent citation extractors we announced [1]I attach a very small sample from the article about Germany where I filter out the related triples and order them by the line number they were extracted from e.g.dbr:Germany dbo:populationTotal "82175700"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki /Germany?oldid=736355524# absolute-line=66 &template=Infobox_country&property=population_est imate&split=1&wikiTextSize=10& plainTextSize=10&valueSize=8> . Looking at the wikipedia article we see:|population_estimate = 82,175,700<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pres at 82.2 million at the end of 2015 – population increase due to high immigration|date=26 August 2016|work=destatis.de}}</ref>semitteilungen/2016/08/PD16_29 5_12411pdf.pdf;jsessionid=996E C2DF0A8D510CF89FDCBC74DBAE9F.c ae2?__blob=publicationFile|tit le=Population Could this approach be a good candidate reference suggestions in Wikidata?(This particular one is already a reference but the anthem and GDP in the attachment are not for example)There are many things that can be done to improve the matching but before getting into details I would like to see if this idea is worth exploring more or notCheers,Dimitris[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dbpedia-discussion%40lists.s ourceforge.net/msg07739.html --Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association_________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Kontokostas Dimitris
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Dario Taraborelli Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter