Hoi,
Sorry for not replying earlier.. I am busy in real life.
It is good to be wrong, particularly about something like this. It is much better to have this engine available to people. What I find relevant is that additional tools are needed to make it shareable. This combined with the learning curve involved, I do not have much time available to me lately, prevent me from exploring it.
I do not really feel the need as WDQ fulfills my needs perfectly. It is because it integrates with the tools that I use.
For me SPARQL may be awesome but as long as it does not integrate with tools and is all over the place, it remains a niche; it is there for some but not others. Once it does integrate and is mostly hidden from view, its power becomes relevant. This has been as true for WDQ; most people use its engine in tools but do not make queries themselves.
Thanks,
GerardM