Wiki namespaces are currently so underused people may not realize their importance: they provide crucial semantic information. For instance, consider the example given in Wikidata's data model article[1]
which yielded these observations:
An alternative lexical model might restate this as
A significant point is that that US Senator page is named Senator:Barack H Obama (or, Legislator:Barack H Obama or Public Employee:Barack H Obama, etc); it is of type US Senator, and it has these three properties, for, from, and until. In other words, if the content from this page is to be shown on the Person:Barack H Obama page, then that content should be transcluded from the Senator page; its semantic markup need not because software can interpret transcluded material as being a "subject" of, &or organic to, the Person page.
Lastly I really don't know how developers will cognitively absorb made-up words like Snak. The need for the term does mystify me somewhat. I do think everyone seems to "get" namespaces, appreciating the clarity they provide. I hope concepts like "namespace" can be equally as prominent at this stage as Snaks in the Wikidata model. Regards, --Hypergrove (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
[1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Wikidata/Data_model