Update: There appear to be quite a few items with duplicate Scotland IDs
(not all of them may be erroneous!):
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:23 AM Magnus Manske <magnusmanske(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
I created (some/most of) these items as part of the
Wiki Loves Monuments
UK 2014 drive, to run the campaign from Wikidata rather than from a bespoke
database. This allows the community (TM) to maintain the data, rather than
one poor sod (e.g., myself) having to frantically update all of it every
year ;-)
"Consumer" tool is here:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/wlmuk/index_wd.html
These are based on "official" data from National Heritage, provided to me
via Wikimedia UK. Grade A (or Grade I/II* in England) structures should be
noteworthy by default.
It appears (as per your examples) that some of these were created as
duplicates/with wrong IDs. As I said, this is based on "official" data, so
it's the best I could do at the time. With mass creation, there are bound
to be a few strays. If you can find some large-scale, systemic issue I'll
try to fix it, but the one-offs will always fall back to manual fixing. At
least, with Wikidata, we can fix them together.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:01 AM Daniel Kinzler <
daniel.kinzler(a)wikimedia.de> wrote:
Am 01.06.2015 um 22:26 schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
Finally, the technical question is: Why is this
even possible? I
thought that,
in each language, label+description are a key
(globally unique), yet
here we
have many pairs of items with exactly the same
label and description.
Or is the
problem that no description was entered and so
the system does not
apply the
key?
The uniqueness constraint does indeed not apply if there is no
description.
--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer
Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata