Hoi,
The notion that we have so many editors who are engaged in adding sources is based on what? IMHO it is wishful thinking that sources matters that much to most editors. When you say that they cannot manage statements as well as sources you miss several important points.

Manually importing of statements is done extensively, I blogged this week about Mrs Nataliya Kobrynska [2] and as a consequence I imported over 1000 statements.Manual import is an existing practice and consequently it is not part of the paper. It is however possible to do away with much of the importing when the content of lists and categories are based on statements .. Much of the basics for such a thing is in place. It will likely change the practices in all Wikipedias when we go that route.

If there is one problem with this vision, it is that it is too Wikipedia centric. The problem is not Wikipedia an sich but the problem is that there is not one Wikipedia but there are so many of them and they all have the notion that they know best. At that they are wrong on principle. A good example are subjects that are "local", this is where the local language typically has an advantage over languages like German, French or English. I am currently adding info on legislative representatives from Kerala and they are much better described in Malayalam [3]. I am however adding info from English..

In conclusion, I understand your point. However, when you look at it from another point of view it is not what will move us on to higher quality for our projects.

Thanks

      GerardM

[1] http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2016/05/wikipedia-citations-librarybase.html

[2] http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2016/05/facebook-nataliya-kobrynska.html

[3] http://ultimategerardm.blogspot.nl/2016/05/wikidata-kerala-mla-constituencies.html


On 30 May 2016 at 23:43, John Erling Blad <jeblad@gmail.com> wrote:
Page 21, moving to manual import of statements. I would really like to see the analysis written out that ends in this conclusion. It is very tempting, but the idea don't scale.

We have now about 5-10 000 articles per active user. Those users have a huge backlog of missing references. If they shall manage statements in addition to their current backlog, then they will simply be overwhelmed.


On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 6:05 PM, Lydia Pintscher <Lydia.Pintscher@wikimedia.de> wrote:
Hey folks :)

Charlie has been working on concepts for making it possible to edit Wikidata from Wikipedia and other wikis. This was her bachelor thesis. She has now published it: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Facilitating_the_use_of_Wikidata_in_Wikimedia_projects_with_a_user-centered_design_approach.pdf
I am very happy she put a lot of thought and work into figuring out all the complexities of the topic and how to make this understandable for editors. We still have more work to do on the concepts and then actually have to implement it. Comments welcome.


Cheers
Lydia
--
Product Manager for Wikidata

Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24
10963 Berlin

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V.

Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 Nz. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207.

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata



_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata