If I understand you correctly, your are looking for a way to describe different
meanings or facettes of a *word*, building clusters based on what other concept
each of these meanings is related to.

Since Wikidata does not (yet) deal with words at all, we can only defer this
until we do (see the Wikidata/Wiktionary proposal). But others have done this:
have a look at the "Wortschatz" project by the University of Leipzig:
http://corpora2.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/res.php?corpusId=deu_newscrawl_2011&word=Bach

The graph at the bottom shows clusters of collocations for each meaning/facette.
It's a bit hard to find good examples though, usually one meaning is very dominant.

Am 01.06.2015 um 15:14 schrieb David Cuenca Tudela:
>
> Hi Leila
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Leila Zia <leila@wikimedia.org

> <mailto:leila@wikimedia.org>> wrote:
>
>     Please correct me if I'm wrong: it seems to be tne case that these questions
>     are more about the interfaces and technologies built on top of Wikidata, not
>     so much about Wikidata itself (except for the point that the fundamental
>     data should exist in Wikidata).
>
>
> Yes, in a way it is more about representation that anything else, but it also
> has to do with the conceptual framework. In the current organization it is
> assumed that I want to know about an specific Q item, whereas in my thinking
> about signals I would prefer to have an overview of all items that are related
> to a keyword.
>
> For instance if I enter Chopin, either I have to select one item from a list or
> I have to perform a search, there is no middle way of displaying an overview of
> all items grouped by the kind of relationship that they might have to the
> keyword chopin. In a way it is a bit like creating a disambiguation page on the
> fly, with the added difficulty of grouping elements that belong together. For
> instance if I search Bach, it would make sense to group people with the string
> "bach" related to the same family together, and divide it by topic, like a sort
> of disambiguation page for data:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bach_%28disambiguation%29
>
> What is difficult is to find an automatic arrangement that works for most
> situations, or explore a different way of creating data disambiguation pages,
> perhaps based on current disambiguation items. Is there any way to make this
> item more useful with some visualization of items it disambiguates?
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q107809
>
> Cheers,
> Micru
>
>

> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>


--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer

Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata