More simply, there's still a long way to go until Wikidata imports all the data contained in Wikipedia infoboxes (or equivalent data from other sources), let alone the rest.

This surprises me. Are there any statistics somewhere on the rate of Wikipedia's infoboxes fully parsed ? 

2018-05-05 19:04 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki@gmail.com>:
Andy Mabbett, 05/05/2018 17:33:
Both Wikidata and DBpedia surely can, and should, coexist because we'll
never be able to host in Wikidata the entirety of the Wikipedias.
Can you give an example of something that can be represented in
DBpedia, but not Wikidata?

More simply, there's still a long way to go until Wikidata imports all the data contained in Wikipedia infoboxes (or equivalent data from other sources), let alone the rest.

So, as Gerard mentions, DBpedia has something more/different to offer. (The same is true for the various extractions of structured data from Wiktionary vs. Wiktionary's own unstructured data.)

That said, the LOD cloud is about links, as far as I understand. Wikidata should be very interesting in it.

Federico


_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata