For every globe we would always need a geodesic system. Even if it is the Mars, we need to know where are the poles, where is the 0 Meridian, etc. Refering to these seems to make most sense.

Which does not mean that we should let the user decide if they want WGS84 or Ares Prime 0, or Selenographic system etc. -- the editor should merely choose "Earth", "Mars", or "Moon" respectively. (Names are made up, I could actually not figure out what the usual geodesic systems are).

Cheers,
Denny



2013/1/8 Jeroen De Dauw <jeroendedauw@gmail.com>
Hey,

Why use Q2 ("earth") as the glob, and not Q215848 ("WSG84")? That would be a lot
clearer, I think.

Since WGS84 implies Earth, this works for Earth. Is such an implication always present though? What if I want to describe a location on some random planet - I suspect you'd have to specify some system and the globe. If this is the case, we should not omit the globe.

Cheers

--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil.
--

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l




--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.