In this case it was fairly easy to find some suitable sources, so I've
updated the claim, and added references. As the original claim was
unsourced, I think it's fine to simply replace it, rather than marking
it as deprecated.
Tony
On 5 November 2017 at 18:39, Nicolas VIGNERON
<vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2017-11-05 19:13 GMT+01:00 Marco Neumann
<marco.neumann(a)gmail.com>om>:
Andrew,
what would be your first choice for conflict resolution here? write an
entry into the relevant item/discuss page? or go for a Requests for
comment on the Community portal? or to contact the claim author
directly?
Hi,
For resolving this specific case, I'd go on the talk page of the item
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Q16191299 and notify the
people concerned (in this case, the wikidatian that added the claim but,
ideally, also the main contributors of the Wikipedia article, « with enough
eyeballs »). Especially in this case where the bottom of the issue seems to
be the lack of sources.
Community pages are more for broad question or if previous discussions
failed to come to a consensus.
Cdlt, ~nicolas
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata