Hi all, I'm wondering about one usage Wikidata could be
useful to Wikipedias : Redlinks subject identification.
Wikidata is good to identify subjects. Redlinks are used in
Wikipedias to identify subjects with currently no article.
I post here because I think there is something to integrate this
further, but I don't know exactly what.
A quick review about the current mechanisms we have to link
items and/or articles and subjects together :
* Wikidata interwikis. This works well. Links an item to
articles and articles titles
* articles redirect. This also works well, now we have a
mechanism to link article redirects with items, which is cool.
* Wikidata items aliases : links a set of lexemes to an
item
* Special:ItemByTitle and Special:GoToLinkedPage which are
great, I don't know how much they are used in practice though
A little bit different but close
* items redirects
This seems this covers a lot of the user usecases. Yet
there is a lot of red links in Wikipedia with actually no
links to a Wikidata item.
My feeling is that what actually lacks in this picture is
that the templates are a bit hackish and that a deeper
integration of item numbers with redlinks would allow to go
further and encourage users to make the links at an earlier
stage. What about a Wikisyntax to put an item number into a
Wikilink or a visual editor integration to suggest an entity
every time a user wants to enter a redlink ?
This seems a low hanging fruit for WIkidata development and
could make Wikidata more real to Wikipedia communities.
Especially compared to doing this at the community level where
this would require a big maintenance effort and community
knowledge about the templates to make the link beetween the
red label and the corresponding item concrete, especially if
visual editor make the information come to eveyone.
One other solution could be to allow to associate items to
yet non existing articles to "reserve" them, allow redlinks
into the Wikidata interwiki list ?