Hoi,

Nitpicking.. I do not have a Wikipedia account, I have multiple all together in a SUL account.

When a discussion takes place you effectively kill it by saying: nanana this is where I will not react and read it. I have a phabricator account and it is not as convenient as good old mail.

Some insist on Phabricator, some on Meta, Mail, Wikidata.. The point is that we want that discussion. When you insist on concentrating, you get situations where you are blamed for the choices you make. Choices that may be unfortunate. And you will complain: but I told you that the discussion was at Phabricator....

Thanks.

GerardM

On 20 September 2015 at 21:13, Daniel Kinzler <daniel.kinzler@wikimedia.de> wrote:

Am 20.09.2015 um 20:52 schrieb Gerard Meijssen:
> Hoi,
> It is certainly one way to exclude many people who might be interested.

Focusing a discussion in one place is a bad thing? I find it rather problematic
if conversations are scattered across several places. It makes it easy to miss
half of it, especially when trying to read up later.

You are welcome to keep this list in sync with the phabricator ticket if you
think it's important. I suggest to make a separate threat with a meaningful
subject line for that.

BTW: I think you can sign into phabricator using your wikipedia account. That
should allow most interrested people to particupate without having to create a
new account. I'm not quite sure of the details though.

--
Daniel Kinzler
Senior Software Developer

Wikimedia Deutschland
Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata