err…point me to the correct item or fix it then? WP:BOLDOn Nov 27, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:GerardMThanks,Hoi,It is highly likely that your Lombard duke already existed. So I think you got it wrong._______________________________________________On 27 November 2015 at 19:31, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:Gerard – I think you’re missing my point. I’m not suggesting this as a display feature (which would be welcome and can always be generated by any tool querying Wikidata labels) but as a contribution stored to avoid future errors.On Nov 27, 2015, at 10:29 AM, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks,GerardM_______________________________________________On 27 November 2015 at 19:26, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:Magnus, this is fantastic and works as expected, thanks a lot.One last note regarding the use of different from (P1889). While I agree with you that it would be overkill to generate all these relations for common homonyms, for new items created by Mix’n’match with the above tweak, where a single other notable individual was previously missing from Wikidata (and when no matching label can be found), it would be tremendously useful to automatically add a two-way relation (see for example Grasulfo (Q3775839) <—> different from (P1889) <—> Grasulfo (Q21571734). Having this property added would save me 2 extra edits and permanently store disambiguation signal for future reference.Thoughts?On Nov 24, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Luca Martinelli <martinelliluca@gmail.com> wrote:<3
L.
Il 23/nov/2015 21:05, "Magnus Manske" <magnusmanske@googlemail.com> ha scritto:_______________________________________________Done.On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:25 PM Asaf Bartov <abartov@wikimedia.org> wrote:On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli@wikimedia.org> wrote:On Nov 21, 2015, at 10:31, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske@googlemail.com> wrote:A soultion could be to change the "not on Wikidata" button (or link) to a "create new item" button. The new item would have a label, a description (maybe), a statement with the catalog ID (if there is an associated WIkidata property!), and "instance of:human" if the entry is internally marked as "person", but nothing else.Would that be welcomed by "mix'n'matchers", and Wikidata people? I think it would make sense, for catalogs with a Wikidata property at least.I would strongly support this, with the restrictions you suggest.+1. This would be good.A._______________________________________________--Asaf Bartov
Wikimedia FoundationImagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidataDario Taraborelli Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidataDario Taraborelli Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidataDario Taraborelli Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata