These are great, important suggestions. But like with the library science resources, it seems like Wikidata is again trying to re-invent an existing wheel. Why are the existing tools in Wikipedia not being migrated and/or pathway'd into Wikidata? The stripping of Wikipedia citations to push it to Wikidata often / always (?) denudes the information of what is a very rigorous requirement on Wiki.I love the Citoid option, or whatever has been deployed for the Wiki Markup editor when you put an ISBN number, OCLC number, or NYTimes URL into the lookups there. There is no interchangeability with Wikidata though?#WikiCite :-)Agree on the {{citation needed}} button, Finn! ha!- Erika_______________________________________________On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Magnus Manske <magnusmanske@googlemail.com> wrote:Magnus* Special watchlist for new statements without reference, especially on otherwise "completely referenced" items* Dedicated drives to complete a "set" (e.g. all women chemists), that is, have all statements references in those items* A list of items/statements that are in "priority need" for referencing. For example, death dates of the recently deceased should be simple, while they are still in the news.* "Reference mode", to quickly add references to statements. (I have a drag'n'drop script, but that breaks on every Wikidata UI update)* Tools to "migrate" Wikipedia references to the actual sources. (Again, I have some, but...)* Automatically add references for statements via external IDs. I have a bot that does that to some degree, but it could use productizing* Show a "smart field" for reference adding, e.g. just paste a URL, and it registers it's an URL, suggests a title from the page at the URL, adds access date, suggests other data that can be inferred from the URL or the linked page, shows likely other fields (e.g. "author" or such) for easy fill-in* Open a blank reference box when adding a statement in the default editor, thus subtly prompting a referenceFor that, improved technology and new approaches are required. Suggestions include:While the proposal of all statements requiring citation is obviously overshooting, I believe we all agree that more/better citations improve Wikidata.One component here would be a social one, namely that it first becomes good practice, then the default, to cite statements.On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:56 PM Brill Lyle <wp.brilllyle@gmail.com> wrote:*blanket, not blanked..._______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata