We have talked informally to some lawyers, some of them specialists in the relevant fields. Basically the understanding I was previously describing was confirmed, but more importantly there has been only a small number of cases testing out the implementation of the European database directive (and the ECJs cases were curtailing the scope of the sui generis protection, see British Horseracing Board v William Hill, Fixtures v Oy Vekkaus, and others).

The US situation is much simpler, as there are no such database rights, and also the Feist v Rural case, which constraints rights on such data widely.

But besides that, yes, we also have formally requested an assessment on the discussed topics (and a bit beyond) from lawyers, but this will take a while until we have the results. Once we have them we will share them.

Cheers,
Denny




2012/12/12 Sven <svenmanguard@gmail.com>
The WMF has lawyers. Why not ask Geoff for an official statement?

Sven


On Dec 12, 2012, at 8:27 AM, Harry Burt <jarry1250@gmail.com> wrote:

(sorry, don't have the proper subject line to hand)

Are proper lawyers being consulted about this (database rights)? The quantity of unofficial speculation on this list is in good faith but still somewhat concerning...

Harry

--
Harry Burt (User:Jarry1250)

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l




--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Obentrautstr. 72 | 10963 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de

Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.