On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> From a machine processing point of view, a more interesting statement is probably:
>
> wd:Q1000336 owl:sameAs <https://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.03pvzn>
Yes, but this proposal matches part of the discussion...
owl:sameAs is
in many cases not appropriate and likely should not be the goal in the
first place: in many cases there is not such a clear 1-to-1 relation,
and even if there is a 1-to-1 relation, the above may still be
inappropriate.