Here is my simple logo proposal for wikidata. I dont know how to create logos. its just my first creation for wikipedia.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wikidata_logo_proposal.png

Sridhar
__________________________________________________________
Sridhar Gutam PhD, ARS, Patent Laws (NALSAR), IP & Biotech. (WIPO)
Senior Scientist (Plant Physiology)
Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture
Rehmankhera, Kakori Post
Lucknow 227107, Uttar Pradesh, India
Phone: +91-522-2841022/23/24; Fax: +91-522-2841025
Mobile:+91-9005760036/8005346136



On 12 April 2012 10:34, Nicolas Torzec <nicolas.torzec@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Indeed, nice set of logos!

I agree with Markus with the fact that the final logo (what ever it
is) should be prominent/recognizable at smaller scales.

I wonder how important it is that the logo shares similarities with
other Wikimedia logos (similar colors/fonts/shapes), so the project
can be easily recognized as a Wikimedia project?

Personally, I am in favor of a simple abstract logo. They usually
stands better the test of time.


-Nicolas


On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Markus Krötzsch
<markus@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> On 08/04/12 21:04, Benjamin Bois wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just finished the new logo from the Markus idea:
>> - http://dl.dropbox.com/u/177440/wikidata/20120407_wikidata10.png
>> Now, I stop and wait for comments and others critics.
>
>
> This is very nice. I do like the overall appearance of this assembled logo.
> Also, the whole work clearly says "I am a logo".
>
> This is a type of logo where one can spend arbitrary amounts of time to
> optimize the appearance (e.g., some icons could be more abstract). But we
> should view this as a draft for now and not discuss every detail yet. The
> icons have a slight cultural bias (with the wine being the most
> controversial), but again this could be refined.
>
> In my view, it would be worth elaborating this further. I hope more people
> agree. The main issue is to make the logo more prominent/recognizable on
> smaller scales (compared to the other logos at [1]), which could require
> some abstraction/coarsening of the icons.
>
> Markus
>
> [1] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikidata_logo_proposals
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Markus Krötzsch
>> <markus@semantic-mediawiki.org <mailto:markus@semantic-mediawiki.org>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>    On 06/04/12 12:35, Benjamin Bois wrote:
>>
>>        Hi Markus,
>>        thank you for helping us (designers) to find the way :)
>>        To help us a bit more, can you (and the other members) give us
>>        elements
>>        to be integrated to the logo in reference to the WikiData
>>        philosophy?
>>
>>
>>    Well, just making suggestions ... in the end (like with all
>>    Wikimedia projects), the community will decide about the logo. The
>>    Wikidata developer team might only decide about the logo for the
>>    software (just like MediaWiki has an own logo that is different from
>>    Wikipedia's logo). So in fact we will need two logos :-)
>>
>>    So what should go into a Wikidata logo? I think: everything that
>>    people collect data about: people, animals, cars, chemistry, music,
>>    math, flowers, computers, ... Like the puzzle globe emphasizes the
>>    textual nature of Wikipedia (in many languages), a Wikidata logo
>>    should emphasize that the project is about the "things" themselves.
>>    I don't know how to make this visually appealing and clearly
>>    recognizable at the scale of a normal wiki logo, but I think it
>>    could be done.
>>
>>    Good luck :-)
>>
>>    Markus
>>
>>
>>        On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Markus Krötzsch
>>        <markus@semantic-mediawiki.org
>>        <mailto:markus@semantic-mediawiki.org> <mailto:markus@semantic-
>>        mediawiki.org <mailto:markus@semantic-mediawiki.org>>>
>>
>>        wrote:
>>
>>            Thanks for all the input!
>>
>>            One thing I would like to keep in mind is that Wikidata is
>>        meant to
>>            be easy and welcoming for a wide audience. As a computer
>>        scientist,
>>            I understand and appreciate imagery like a steel database
>>        cylinder,
>>            but I think it could look a bit technocratic to "normal"
>>        people. I
>>            don't have concrete proposals, but I would find it amazing
>>        if the
>>            logo could have a human touch to it.
>>
>>            One idea maybe: many people will know the Unilever logo [1] (a
>> U
>>            made of a variety of objects). There are various logos in
>>        similar
>>            style (see also the "earth" category at logotrends 2011
>>        [2]). Maybe
>>            something like this would be suitable for us, to show that
>>        Wikidata
>>            is about a wide range of topics and people. But making such
>>        a logo
>>            is a bit of work.
>>
>>            Cheers,
>>
>>            Markus
>>
>>            [1] https://www.google.com/search?
>> q=unilever+logo&um=1&tbm=isch
>>        <https://www.google.com/ search?q=unilever+logo&um=1& tbm=isch
>>        <https://www.google.com/search?q=unilever+logo&um=1&tbm=isch>>
>>            [2] http://www.logolounge.com/ article.asp
>>        <http://www.logolounge.com/ article.asp
>>        <http://www.logolounge.com/article.asp>>?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>            On 05/04/12 08:39, Lydia Pintscher wrote:
>>
>>                Hey folks :)
>>
>>                You're all awesome for creating pretty logos! Love them.
>>                Can you all add them to
>>        http://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Talk:Wikidata#WikiData_
>>                logo_candidate
>>        <http://meta.wikimedia.org/ wiki/Talk:Wikidata#WikiData_
>>        logo_candidate
>>
>>  <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikidata#WikiData_logo_candidate>>
>>                please so we don't lose any of them?
>>
>>
>>                Cheers
>>                Lydia
>>
>>
>>
>>            ______________________________ _________________
>>            Wikidata-l mailing list
>>        Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>        <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
>>        <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists. wikimedia.org
>>        <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org>>
>>        https://lists.wikimedia.org/ mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>        <https://lists.wikimedia.org/ mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>        <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>        ______________________________ _________________
>>        Wikidata-l mailing list
>>        Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>>        <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
>>        https://lists.wikimedia.org/ mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>        <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l>
>>
>>
>>
>>    ______________________________ _________________
>>    Wikidata-l mailing list
>>    Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
>>    https://lists.wikimedia.org/ mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>    <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l