Ah, as Markus mentions, since we already have https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P214

Then the rest of the problem is just a readability issue.
So there is no need for renaming property names as I suggested and suffixing with ID.... P214 solves the grouping problem fairly easily.

And Lydia says readability in general is going to improve...just wait.

So, I am looking forward to the site display improvements in the future and more use of P214.


On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Joe Filceolaire <filceolaire@gmail.com> wrote:

Best to have a statement (instance of:wikidata database index property) instead of trying to do this with the English language label as it is easier to localise statement s.

On 4 Apr 2015 17:23, "Helder ." <helder.wiki@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Smolenski Nikola <smolensk@eunet.rs> wrote:
> Citiranje Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>:
>> I think a simple naming convention would suffice (and clean up the existing
>> ones):  <blah> ID such as for example:
>>
>> CANTIC ID
>> Freebase ID
>> Munzinger IBA ID
>> NLP ID
>> dmoz ID
>> Oxford Biography Index ID
>> SELIBR ID
>
> How would you name ISBN, for example? ISBN ID? :)

And how would this work with translations?

Helder

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l