Hi Community!

2 questions:

1. "has quality" P1552 already has a few P1659 "see also" statements.  Great! However, if anyone knows of any additional "see also" statements for it that users might be made aware of, then I would greatly appreciate anyone adding them.  I read all the prior proposal talk and nothing obvious came to my might, but I know we have some property experts that might instantly know of a few that could be added to help wanderers such as myself.

2. "has quality" P1552 feels like it is missing something to help with additional meaning and semantic intent when it comes to Linked Data.  Perhaps added into a Wikidata property classification like maybe these or only one of them or something else?