Hoi,<div>First things first ... that is getting Wikidata to work for its initial purposes. Automated updates from elsewhere are nice but introduce a complete new set of issues including reliability.</div><div>Thanks,</div>

<div>     Gerard<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 April 2012 03:25, JFC Morfin <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:jefsey@jefsey.com">jefsey@jefsey.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

Is there an objection to the concept of, or cooperation with, &quot;datawiki&quot; Wikidata compatible projects? I would define a &quot;datawiki&quot; (as there are databases) as a JSON oriented NoSQL DBMS using an enhanced wiki as a human user I/O interface. This would permit BigData, specialized data, and graph sources to feed Wikidata along their own data philosophy and collection/update policy. I suppose that the main point would be an inter-datawiki interchange protocol (RFC?) matching the datawiki authoritative operators&#39; (the first of them being Wikidata) requirements. I would permit projects at different stages of R&amp;D or with different main purposes in order to cooperate with Wikidata.<br>


jfc<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Wikidata-l mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org" target="_blank">Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>