Hoi,

When an external ontology says that something is a disease and the DSM-5 says it is not. There is a huge problem.

When something is not what it is said to be. Should we allow for things that are diametrical the opposite of each other. The problem is that labels like this have a massive impact. When they are manifestly wrong should we include them because an external ontology says so?

Thanks,

GerardM