I'd also say that it would be a very good idea NOT TO RUN BOTS THAT ADD GRAMMATICAL FORMS.

Wiktionaries in some languages have templates and modules that show things like verb conjugation and noun declension.  If I'm allowed to fantasize, the ideal thing to do would be to have something like a common API framework in Wikibase Lexeme (probably in Lua or JavaScript), and that different languages would be able to auto-generate forms in a robust way. The problem of doing it with bots is that if something is wrong or incomplete, fixing it later will be a nightmare. In fact, doing it with a bot would be a regression when compared doing it with a template, as it's done in Wiktionary.

I don't know whether Wikibase developers actually plan to create such a framework—it's just a wish :)

--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬


‫בתאריך יום ג׳, 4 בדצמ׳ 2018 ב-19:48 מאת <‪fn@imm.dtu.dk‬‏>:‬
I recall reading in an announcement for Wikidata lexemes that we should
not (yet) run (large) import jobs for Wikidata lexemes. I cannot
immediately find that message.

I am wondering what the attitude of the Wikidata developers and users
are wrt. import jobs for Wikidata lexemes?

Specifically, I am thinking on importing DanNet, a Danish lexical
resource in RDF for which we recently gained a property for one of type
of data: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P6140


Finn Årup Nielsen
http://people.compute.dtu.dk/faan/

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata